September 1, 2010 10:49:23 PM CEST
The link above is not really relevant to the topic except that the speaker is talking about at some point enough is enough- or at least it should be. For me it was 9-11. I never cared about so-called conspiracy theories before, I never really cared that much who killed JFK. But 9-11 was so in-your-face, I couldn't ignore it.
Probably the most glaring inconsistency for me was the missing concrete. I remember seeing a massive pyroclastic flow of white dust blowing across the Hudson, suspended in air- and it was not smoke. Later I saw the images of emergency personnel navigating there way to the site, driving on about 2 inches of fine white powder. Wtf?
Even a conventional controlled demolition leaves a rubble pile of approx. 10% of the original height of the building. But we're expected to believe that a pancake collapse occurred leaving almost no rubble pile and no concrete. If the official account is correct, there should have been floor stacked upon floor, but what we saw was the top 1/3 of each building plow through the bottom 2/3rds with almost no resistance, leaving almost no rubble pile while the concrete literally disappeared-exploding itself into a fine airborne dust DURING the collapse. No conventional explosive can do that, and certainly not gravity alone. It's absolutely laughable.